Still Spiraling Over That One Comment? MrBeast Has a 95 Percent Rule for That

You know that feeling where 47 people say something nice and one person says something not-so-nice—and somehow that one comment is the only thing you think about for the next three days? Your brain just loops it. In the shower. Before bed. Mid-conversation with someone who definitely doesn’t deserve your distracted energy.

On Good Guys, hosts Josh Peck and Ben Soffer sit down with MrBeast—aka Jimmy Donaldson, one of the biggest creators on the internet—to talk about how he processes feedback without letting it wreck him. He has read “millions” of comments over 15 years, and now feels literally nothing when someone tells him the worst things imaginable. But here’s what’s interesting: he’s not numb because he stopped caring. He just changed what he’s looking for. 

How to Deal With Negative Comments: MrBeast’s 95 Percent Rule

Stop letting the loudest voice in the room win

The person who loves you and the person who thinks you should log off forever are the ones who bother to comment. Everyone else just…keeps scrolling. And yet somehow, we treat that one unhinged opinion like it’s the verdict on our entire existence.

Donaldson doesn’t do that. He’s looking for something else entirely.

“All you’re looking for is like, did 95 percent of people enjoy it?” he explains. “You never over-index on their crazy outliers…As long as 95-ish percent of people enjoyed what you put out or liked it, then you’re good. But you’re never going to make a hundred percent happy.”

This is the 95 percent rule: stop asking “does everyone love this?” and start asking “does this work for most people?” The goal isn’t universal approval—that’s impossible and will make you insane. The goal is signal. Did the thing land for the people it was supposed to land for?

Studies on negativity bias show that humans are wired to take negative feedback way more seriously than positive feedback. It’s evolutionary—our brains are wired to scan for threats. But that means one critical comment can completely overshadow dozens of positive ones, even when the math doesn’t support that reaction at all.

Think about it in your own life. Your boss gives you a glowing review with one piece of constructive feedback. Which part do you replay for three days? Fifteen people laugh at your joke; one person doesn’t react. Who do you fixate on? Your post gets 200 likes and 2 weird comments. Which ones do you screenshot to your group chat?

The 95 percent rule is a pattern interrupt. It forces you to zoom out and check the actual ratio instead of letting the loudest voice hijack your brain.

Feedback is data, not a personality test

“I probably spend an hour and a half a day reading comments or tweets or whatever about me and our content,” Donaldson says. “And I’ve probably read over a million, millions at this point over the course of the last 15 years.”

That sounds like emotional self-harm until you realize how he’s actually using it. He’s not scrolling to see if people like him. He’s scanning for information. Patterns. Signals about what worked and what didn’t.

“You could tweet at me like, ‘Jimmy, go f*cking kill yourself. I hate you.’ And I could read that and I would literally feel nothing,” he reveals. Not because he’s cold. Because he stopped treating comments like a verdict on who he is. They’re just data points.

Most of us do the opposite. We read one bad message and suddenly it’s not feedback anymore. It’s a story about our worth. We spiral. We rewrite the whole day in our head. And we decide this one stranger is secretly telling the truth about us.

Donaldson trained himself out of that by mentally sorting everything he sees. Some comments are useful. Some are just personal taste. And some are pure noise. When you read feedback like a scientist instead of a defendant on trial, the emotional weight changes.

Find the pattern, make one change, move on

Here’s where most people get stuck: they collect feedback, feel bad about it, and then…do nothing. The comments just sit there, festering, turning into a story about who they are instead of something they can use. Donaldson’s loop is different—collect repeated notes, pick one thing to fix, implement it, ship, move on.

After Beast Games season one dropped, he pulled out the pattern.

“A lot of the reviews and a lot of comments were like, we don’t like how much randomness there is,” he recalls. “Like we want the winner of the largest cash prize in history to win it because they earned it. Not because they flipped a coin and got lucky…And we really took that to heart. And so in season two, we completely removed all randomness and we made it very skill-based.” Same thing with the contestant count. People felt like they couldn’t connect when there were a thousand players, so in season two they started with 200.

What makes his process work is that he fixes the thing that keeps coming up. Everything else gets tossed into the “that’s just the internet” pile.

“Before I came in here, I was literally reading the subreddit and every single post [was] like, ‘Oh my God, there’s no RNG. It feels so much better. There’s less people. We know the contestants’ names. This is great,’” he says. “And I was like, perfect.”

You can steal this loop for basically anything. If you’re a creator, what’s the ONE piece of feedback you keep hearing? Address that; ignore the rest for now. If it’s work stuff, what’s the repeated note in your reviews? Pick one thing to change this quarter. Even in your personal life—if multiple people in your orbit keep saying the same thing, that’s probably the signal.

The point is action. Feedback without action is just rumination with extra steps.

Want to hear the full conversation with MrBeast? Tune into Good Guys, available now wherever you get your podcasts.

Read Next

• Negative Thoughts Got You Spiraling? ‘Don’t Think’ Has a Trick for That
• Why You RSVP Yes, Spiral for Weeks, Then Irish Exit, According to ‘Don’t Think’
• Why Trying to Fix Your Life Can Make It Feel Worse, According to Carla Bezanson